October 3, 2013 • Cee • Holy Mother Cover

judgingabookbyitscoverSTpng

Inspired by Pure Imagination Blog and Stacked.

Let’s be honest, nobody follows the age-old cliché that tells us not to judge a book by its covers. If you say you do, I am side-eyeing you. Book covers are the first thing that attracts any of us readers to a book. Before you pick up a book, the cover can essentially make or break a book. If I don’t like a cover design, I won’t pick it up. Lucky for us, publishing companies publish different cover designs, especially when a paperback book comes out. Sometimes we like it, sometimes we don’t. Whatever the changes with cover designs, I will discuss it. 

Today, we look at the cover of The Raven Boys by Maggie Stiefvater.

cc trb

Okay, okay, I know there isn’t a vast difference between the hardcover cover and the paperback cover, so why talk about it at all? Well, I’m still on the “meeting Maggie Stiefvater” high and I want to talk about cover changes. My next logical thought was – “hey, let’s talk about the changes in The Raven Boys and voilà, here we are. 

I love both covers because it’s a frickin’ painting! Any cover designs done by hand is a big A++++ in my book! I am always jealous of artists because, wow, they always blow me away with their drawings or paintings. I love the majestic raven hovering (or posing) like a goddamn boss, giving no fucks at all. The painting strokes of the raven’s feather is absolutely striking; the detail of it makes me want to squeal in joy. It is just so gorgeous. (I want to attempt to paint a raven myself, but alas, I have no painting talent.) For the paperback,  I like that the image of the four boys is pretty accurate to Maggie’s description of them. (My hands are clutching my cheeks because hot damn! They are a good-looking bunch. ;D) I cheered that the boys are drawn instead of being an actual photograph of cover models because to me, photo-type covers get dated extremely fast.

But now we arrive at the dreaded “things I don’t like in this cover change” paragraph. What could I possibly dislike in this gorgeous cover? (You might ask.) I’ll tell you. It feels very cluttered. When I look at the hardcover design, I’m struck by the raven and the ley lines (two of the most important images in the book), but when I look at the paperback design, a lot of things are going on that I don’t know where my eyes should look at first. It doesn’t strike me as hard as the huge raven in the hardcover that commands my attention. The four boys’ presence demands my attention (which is good), but they blind me from spotting the ley lines, which looks like it fades into the background. And also, the raven isn’t a looming figure. I don’t like that the title is the same color as Maggie Stiefvater’s name because it doesn’t strike me as hard. It doesn’t feel unique or…separate (they look very together)? It’s really hard to explain.

The Raven Boys is a cover that, despite my dislikes, I love to pieces. I feel a deeper connection to covers when it is drawn. Maybe it’s because I know that it was handmade and I admire talented artists who can make me squeal in joy and make me jealous at the same time. Also, ravens are cool! ‘Nuff said.

(For those who are wondering about the cover artist, both covers are done by Adam S. Doyle, who also did The Dream Thieves and the paperback version of The Scorpio Races.)

What did you think of the cover designs and the changes? What do you like it? Is there anything you would change?


 

9 Responses to “Cover Change | The Raven Boys by Maggie Stiefvater”

  1. This is one of those books I’ll be buying in hardcover. I prefer paperbacks most of the time (cheaper, easier to read and I don’t know, I like the look) but I agree about the cluttered feeling. I like the simplicity of the hardcover more :)

  2. I definitely like the hardcover cover better. I agree that with the drawings of the boys, the whole cover looks more cluttered. And now with all the words (title and author) laying above the images, it makes them appear less clear too.

  3. This isn’t a cover change I necessarily really DISLIKE, but I don’t particularly LIKE it either. There are some cover changes I’m just like “EWW, no why would you do that”. I do think the paperback design has the same feel overall and by itself isn’t a bad design, but I also like the simplicity and the striking of the original more. Overall, though, if they had to change the cover, this is not an awful change.

  4. I like the hardcover version better. The paperback cover is too busy. I didn’t even notice the lines on the PB until you pointed it out. But I do like the red of the font on the PB better.

  5. Arial says:

    I recently got to meet Maggie Stiefvater too, so I can completely understand your excitement!

    I like the original cover better because, as you said, the second is much more cluttered. There are too many elements trying to get my attention that I don’t know what to look at first. It seems as though you could divide the paperback cover into two separate covers between the top and bottom halves. Also, the weird shadow around the title makes it harder to read. I do love the paintings and the brush detail though! I wish I had a copy of the paperback version of The Scorpio Races because it is GORGEOUS!

  6. The hard cover wins hands down. I’m really not a fan of the re-design at all. The original is so much more striking; you can really see the detail of the raven much better and it is simply overall more appealing than the PB.

  7. This is such a MAGICAL series, and I love that you took the time to break the cover down bit by bit. I have to say that I prefer the hardback copy, though, because like you said, the paperback looks a bit too crowded — and to be honest, I don’t like GUY models on the cover, haha. Even though I know the book is about the raven boys, I think having those four down there, posing, is kind of lame. Plus, I doubt Gansey or Ronan or Adam would willingly pose for anything, anyway. :P

    I love the majestic raven hovering (or posing) like a goddamn boss, giving no fucks at all. ” — LOL! Yep, Chainsaw looks pretty darn good. And I didn’t know it had been painted! Love that aspect as well. :D

  8. For me the hardcover looks way more cooler than the paperback cover. I didn’t like this book but the cover is gorgeous. I love how it relates to the story, and it kinda reminds me of Edgar Allan Poe’s poem just b/c it has a raven.

  9. Hardcover art. I don’t like the boys at the bottom of the book for the paperback. It just looks very very odd.


Leave a Reply